On 15 Apr 2022, at 10:08, Paolo Valerio wrote:
Given a sufficiently large number of actions, while copying and reserving memory for a new action of a new flow, if next_offset is greater than MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE, the function reserve_sfa_size() does not return -EMSGSIZE as expected, but it allocates MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE bytes increasing actions_len by req_size. This can then lead to an OOB write access, especially when further actions need to be copied.
Fix it by rearranging the flow action size check.
KASAN splat below:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch] Write of size 65360 at addr ffff888147e4001c by task handler15/836
CPU: 1 PID: 836 Comm: handler15 Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1+ #27 ... Call Trace:
<TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x5a print_report.cold+0x5e/0x5db ? __lock_text_start+0x8/0x8 ? reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch] kasan_report+0xb5/0x130 ? reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch] kasan_check_range+0xf5/0x1d0 memcpy+0x39/0x60 reserve_sfa_size+0x1ba/0x380 [openvswitch] __add_action+0x24/0x120 [openvswitch] ovs_nla_add_action+0xe/0x20 [openvswitch] ovs_ct_copy_action+0x29d/0x1130 [openvswitch] ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x56/0xa0 ? create_prof_cpu_mask+0x20/0x20 ? ovs_ct_verify+0xf0/0xf0 [openvswitch] ? prep_compound_page+0x198/0x2a0 ? __kasan_check_byte+0x10/0x40 ? kasan_unpoison+0x40/0x70 ? ksize+0x44/0x60 ? reserve_sfa_size+0x75/0x380 [openvswitch] __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0xc26/0x2070 [openvswitch] ? __zone_watermark_ok+0x420/0x420 ? validate_set.constprop.0+0xc90/0xc90 [openvswitch] ? __alloc_pages+0x1a9/0x3e0 ? __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x1da0/0x1da0 ? unwind_next_frame+0x991/0x1e40 ? __mod_node_page_state+0x99/0x120 ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x2e3/0x470 ? __kasan_kmalloc_large+0x90/0xe0 ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x1b4/0x2c0 [openvswitch] ovs_flow_cmd_new+0x3cd/0xb10 [openvswitch] ...
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f28cd2af22a0 ("openvswitch: fix flow actions reallocation") Signed-off-by: Paolo Valerio pvalerio@redhat.com
Change looks fine to me.
Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron echaudro@redhat.com
net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c index 7176156d3844..4c09cf8a0ab2 100644 --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c @@ -2465,7 +2465,7 @@ static struct nlattr *reserve_sfa_size(struct sw_flow_actions **sfa, new_acts_size = max(next_offset + req_size, ksize(*sfa) * 2);
if (new_acts_size > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) {
if ((MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE - next_offset) < req_size) {
if ((next_offset + req_size) > MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE) { OVS_NLERR(log, "Flow action size exceeds max %u", MAX_ACTIONS_BUFSIZE); return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev