Hi Sasha, On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:23:55AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag fixing commit: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver (currently for ICH9 devices only)").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.6.14, v5.4.42, v4.19.124, v4.14.181, v4.9.224, v4.4.224.
v5.6.14: Build OK! v5.4.42: Build OK! v4.19.124: Build OK! v4.14.181: Build OK! v4.9.224: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: c8744f44aeae ("e1000e: Add Support for CannonLake")
v4.4.224: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 16ecba59bc33 ("e1000e: Do not read ICR in Other interrupt") 18dd23920703 ("e1000e: use BIT() macro for bit defines") 74f31299a41e ("e1000e: Increase PHY PLL clock gate timing") c8744f44aeae ("e1000e: Add Support for CannonLake") f3ed935de059 ("e1000e: initial support for i219-LM (3)")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
We could discard the change for v4.9 and v4.4 IMO, as their impact should be minor.
Thanks, Chenyu
-- Thanks Sasha