----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Vorel" pvorel@suse.cz To: "CKI Project" cki-project@redhat.com Cc: "Linux Stable maillist" stable@vger.kernel.org, "LTP Mailing List" ltp@lists.linux.it, "Nikolai Kondrashov" spbnick@gmail.com Sent: Friday, March 6, 2020 9:08:38 AM Subject: Re: [LTP] ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.5.8-97453d9.cki (stable)
Hi,
We ran automated tests on a recent commit from this kernel tree:
Kernel repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git Commit: 97453d9b9b2b - Linux 5.5.8The results of these automated tests are provided below.
Overall result: FAILED (see details below) Merge: OK Compile: OK Tests: FAILEDAll kernel binaries, config files, and logs are available for download here:
https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/index.html?prefix=datawareh...
One or more kernel tests failed:
s390x: ❌ stress: stress-ng ❌ LTPHere it's 9 syscalls failed for "slept for too long" [1] 28 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: clock_nanosleep() slept for too long 12 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: nanosleep() slept for too long 27 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: poll() slept for too long 22 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: prctl() slept for too long 25 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: select() slept for too long 76 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: select() slept for too long 126 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: select() slept for too long 22 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: futex_wait() slept for too long 53 tst_timer_test.c:310: FAIL: futex_wait() slept for too long
BTW it'd be interesting to see previous build. I searched for stable in jobs [2], but there is no linux-5.5.y (I see linux-5.4.y).
We're not on the main kernelci.org page just yet. There's a staging grafana instance with a limited set of data:
https://staging.kernelci.org:3000/d/home/home?orgId=1&var-origin=redhat&...
We're planning the dashboard I mentioned in the previous email which should make the discovery easier, as well as working on getting on the main Kernel CI page. The best way right now is to check previous stable emails by CKI Project in the archives:
https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linux-stable-mirror/2020-March/
These are two 5.5.y test runs from the list:
https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linux-stable-mirror/2020-March/174716.htm... https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linux-stable-mirror/2020-March/174715.htm...
jstancek also already seems to be looking into some s390x issues which might be related:
https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linux-stable-mirror/2020-March/174549.htm...
Veronika
Kind regards, Petr
[1] https://cki-artifacts.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/datawarehouse/2020/03/05/47... [2] https://kernelci.org/job/