From: Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de
commit cff3bd012a9512ac5ed858d38e6ed65f6391008c upstream.
nft_chain_validate already performs loop detection because a cycle will result in a call stack overflow (ctx->level >= NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE).
It also follows maps via ->validate callback in nft_lookup, so there appears no reason to iterate the maps again.
nf_tables_check_loops() and all its helper functions can be removed. This improves ruleset load time significantly, from 23s down to 12s.
This also fixes a crash bug. Old loop detection code can result in unbounded recursion:
BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit at .... Oops: stack guard page: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 4 PID: 1539 Comm: nft Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5+ #1 [..]
with a suitable ruleset during validation of register stores.
I can't see any actual reason to attempt to check for this from nft_validate_register_store(), at this point the transaction is still in progress, so we don't have a full picture of the rule graph.
For nf-next it might make sense to either remove it or make this depend on table->validate_state in case we could catch an error earlier (for improved error reporting to userspace).
Fixes: 20a69341f2d0 ("netfilter: nf_tables: add netlink set API") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal fw@strlen.de Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso pablo@netfilter.org --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 127 ++++------------------------------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 2b5e9efe86dd..249c30c47cbd 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -3349,6 +3349,15 @@ static void nf_tables_rule_release(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_rule *r nf_tables_rule_destroy(ctx, rule); }
+/** nft_chain_validate - loop detection and hook validation + * + * @ctx: context containing call depth and base chain + * @chain: chain to validate + * + * Walk through the rules of the given chain and chase all jumps/gotos + * and set lookups until either the jump limit is hit or all reachable + * chains have been validated. + */ int nft_chain_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_chain *chain) { struct nft_expr *expr, *last; @@ -3367,6 +3376,9 @@ int nft_chain_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_chain *chain) if (!expr->ops->validate) continue;
+ /* This may call nft_chain_validate() recursively, + * callers that do so must increment ctx->level. + */ err = expr->ops->validate(ctx, expr, &data); if (err < 0) return err; @@ -9087,119 +9099,6 @@ int nft_chain_validate_hooks(const struct nft_chain *chain, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nft_chain_validate_hooks);
-/* - * Loop detection - walk through the ruleset beginning at the destination chain - * of a new jump until either the source chain is reached (loop) or all - * reachable chains have been traversed. - * - * The loop check is performed whenever a new jump verdict is added to an - * expression or verdict map or a verdict map is bound to a new chain. - */ - -static int nf_tables_check_loops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - const struct nft_chain *chain); - -static int nft_check_loops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - const struct nft_set_ext *ext) -{ - const struct nft_data *data; - int ret; - - data = nft_set_ext_data(ext); - switch (data->verdict.code) { - case NFT_JUMP: - case NFT_GOTO: - ret = nf_tables_check_loops(ctx, data->verdict.chain); - break; - default: - ret = 0; - break; - } - - return ret; -} - -static int nf_tables_loop_check_setelem(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - struct nft_set *set, - const struct nft_set_iter *iter, - struct nft_set_elem *elem) -{ - const struct nft_set_ext *ext = nft_set_elem_ext(set, elem->priv); - - if (nft_set_ext_exists(ext, NFT_SET_EXT_FLAGS) && - *nft_set_ext_flags(ext) & NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL_END) - return 0; - - return nft_check_loops(ctx, ext); -} - -static int nf_tables_check_loops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, - const struct nft_chain *chain) -{ - const struct nft_rule *rule; - const struct nft_expr *expr, *last; - struct nft_set *set; - struct nft_set_binding *binding; - struct nft_set_iter iter; - - if (ctx->chain == chain) - return -ELOOP; - - list_for_each_entry(rule, &chain->rules, list) { - nft_rule_for_each_expr(expr, last, rule) { - struct nft_immediate_expr *priv; - const struct nft_data *data; - int err; - - if (strcmp(expr->ops->type->name, "immediate")) - continue; - - priv = nft_expr_priv(expr); - if (priv->dreg != NFT_REG_VERDICT) - continue; - - data = &priv->data; - switch (data->verdict.code) { - case NFT_JUMP: - case NFT_GOTO: - err = nf_tables_check_loops(ctx, - data->verdict.chain); - if (err < 0) - return err; - break; - default: - break; - } - } - } - - list_for_each_entry(set, &ctx->table->sets, list) { - if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, set)) - continue; - if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_MAP) || - set->dtype != NFT_DATA_VERDICT) - continue; - - list_for_each_entry(binding, &set->bindings, list) { - if (!(binding->flags & NFT_SET_MAP) || - binding->chain != chain) - continue; - - iter.genmask = nft_genmask_next(ctx->net); - iter.skip = 0; - iter.count = 0; - iter.err = 0; - iter.fn = nf_tables_loop_check_setelem; - - set->ops->walk(ctx, set, &iter); - if (iter.err < 0) - return iter.err; - } - } - - return 0; -} - /** * nft_parse_u32_check - fetch u32 attribute and check for maximum value * @@ -9335,7 +9234,7 @@ static int nft_validate_register_store(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, if (data != NULL && (data->verdict.code == NFT_GOTO || data->verdict.code == NFT_JUMP)) { - err = nf_tables_check_loops(ctx, data->verdict.chain); + err = nft_chain_validate(ctx, data->verdict.chain); if (err < 0) return err; }