From: Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
commit bfcba38d95a0aed146a958a84a2177af1459eddc upstream.
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free() uses hdl->lock, which in ov5640 driver is set to sensor's own sensor->lock. In ov5640_remove(), the driver destroys the sensor->lock first, and then calls v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(), resulting in the use of the destroyed mutex.
Fix this by calling moving the mutex_destroy() to the end of the cleanup sequence, as there's no need to destroy the mutex as early as possible.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkeinen@ti.com Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.14+ Reviewed-by: Benoit Parrot bparrot@ti.com Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mchehab+huawei@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c @@ -3068,8 +3068,8 @@ static int ov5640_probe(struct i2c_clien free_ctrls: v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler); entity_cleanup: - mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity); + mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); return ret; }
@@ -3079,9 +3079,9 @@ static int ov5640_remove(struct i2c_clie struct ov5640_dev *sensor = to_ov5640_dev(sd);
v4l2_async_unregister_subdev(&sensor->sd); - mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock); media_entity_cleanup(&sensor->sd.entity); v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls.handler); + mutex_destroy(&sensor->lock);
return 0; }