On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:05 PM Borislav Petkov bp@alien8.de wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc cycle (left there inadvertently while I was on leave), any concerns with me sending this to Linus directly during the merge window?
What's wrong with them going through tip?
There's been a paucity of response on these after converging on the feedback from Linus. They missed v5.9, and I started casting about for what could be done to make sure they did not also miss v5.10 if the quiet continued. The preference is still "through tip".
But before that pls have a look at this question I have here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929102512.GB21110@zn.tnic
Thx.
Thanks, Boris, will do.