3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit d68827c62a105eec547945daedf4d1d3e283717d ]
Commit 8e4934c6d6c6 ("tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: clear receive flag on FIFO flush") implemented clearing of the receive flag by reading the status register only. It turned out that even though we flush the FIFO afterwards, a explicit read of the data register is still required.
This leads to a FIFO underrun. To avoid this, follow the advice in the overrun "Operation section": Unconditionally clear RXUF after using RXFLUSH.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner stefan@agner.ch Signed-off-by: Bhuvanchandra DV bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c index af3047d8322a..92b7a5bf7c4d 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/fsl_lpuart.c @@ -910,13 +910,16 @@ static void lpuart_setup_watermark(struct lpuart_port *sport) writeb(val | UARTPFIFO_TXFE | UARTPFIFO_RXFE, sport->port.membase + UARTPFIFO);
- /* explicitly clear RDRF */ - readb(sport->port.membase + UARTSR1); - /* flush Tx and Rx FIFO */ writeb(UARTCFIFO_TXFLUSH | UARTCFIFO_RXFLUSH, sport->port.membase + UARTCFIFO);
+ /* explicitly clear RDRF */ + if (readb(sport->port.membase + UARTSR1) & UARTSR1_RDRF) { + readb(sport->port.membase + UARTDR); + writeb(UARTSFIFO_RXUF, sport->port.membase + UARTSFIFO); + } + writeb(0, sport->port.membase + UARTTWFIFO); writeb(1, sport->port.membase + UARTRWFIFO);