On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 05:40:54PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:18 AM Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:10:25AM -0700, Zubin Mithra wrote:
From: Ian Kent raven@themaw.net
commit 0633da48f0793aeba27f82d30605624416723a91 upstream.
autofs_sbi() does not check the superblock magic number to verify it has been given an autofs super block.
Backport Note: autofs4 has been renamed to autofs upstream. As a result the upstream patch does not apply cleanly onto 4.14.y.
What about other kernel trees, this should also go into 4.18.y, right?
Upstream commit 0633da48f0793aeba27f82d30605624416723a91 applies directly to 4.18.y.
Ah, makes sense, now queued up for 4.14.y and 4.18.y, thanks.
Anything older than 4.14.y?
It does apply to v4.4.y and v4.9,y, but it has minor include file conflicts (different for each release).
Thanks, that was easy to fix up.
greg k-h