From: Dominique Martinet asmadeus@codewreck.org
[ Upstream commit 52f1c45dde9136f964d63a77d19826c8a74e2c7f ]
syzbot reported a double-lock here and we no longer need this lock after requests have been moved off to local list: just drop the lock earlier.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220904064028.1305220-1-asmadeus@codewreck.org Reported-by: syzbot+50f7e8d06c3768dd97f3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet asmadeus@codewreck.org Tested-by: Schspa Shi schspa@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/9p/trans_fd.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c index 9268f808afc0..7d68b4a63997 100644 --- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c +++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err) list_move(&req->req_list, &cancel_list); }
+ spin_unlock(&m->client->lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) { p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req); list_del(&req->req_list); @@ -227,7 +229,6 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err) req->t_err = err; p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR); } - spin_unlock(&m->client->lock); }
static __poll_t