From: Jason Yan yanaijie@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 32c850bf587f993b2620b91e5af8a64a7813f504 ]
If we went into sas_rediscover_dev() the attached_sas_addr was already insured not to be zero. So it's unnecessary to check if the attached_sas_addr is zero.
And although if the sas address is not changed, we always have to unregister the old device when we are going to register a new one. We cannot just leave the device there and bring up the new.
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan yanaijie@huawei.com CC: chenxiang chenxiang66@hisilicon.com CC: John Garry john.garry@huawei.com CC: Johannes Thumshirn jthumshirn@suse.de CC: Ewan Milne emilne@redhat.com CC: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de CC: Tomas Henzl thenzl@redhat.com CC: Dan Williams dan.j.williams@intel.com CC: Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.com Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn jthumshirn@suse.de Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke hare@suse.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index b141d1061f38e..2ee9c4ec7a541 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -2062,14 +2062,11 @@ static int sas_rediscover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, bool last) return res; }
- /* delete the old link */ - if (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr) && - SAS_ADDR(sas_addr) != SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)) { - SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy 0x%x replace %016llx\n", - SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, - SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)); - sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(dev, phy_id, last); - } + /* we always have to delete the old device when we went here */ + SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy 0x%x replace %016llx\n", + SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, + SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)); + sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(dev, phy_id, last);
return sas_discover_new(dev, phy_id); }