4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christoph Lameter cl@linux.com
commit 09c2e76ed734a1d36470d257a778aaba28e86531 upstream.
Callers of __alloc_alien() check for NULL. We must do the same check in __alloc_alien_cache to avoid NULL pointer dereferences on allocation failures.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/010001680f42f192-82b4e12e-1565-4ee0-ae1f-1e98974906... Fixes: 49dfc304ba241 ("slab: use the lock on alien_cache, instead of the lock on array_cache") Fixes: c8522a3a5832b ("Slab: introduce alloc_alien") Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter cl@linux.com Reported-by: syzbot+d6ed4ec679652b4fd4e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Pekka Enberg penberg@kernel.org Cc: David Rientjes rientjes@google.com Cc: Joonsoo Kim iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- mm/slab.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -682,8 +682,10 @@ static struct alien_cache *__alloc_alien struct alien_cache *alc = NULL;
alc = kmalloc_node(memsize, gfp, node); - init_arraycache(&alc->ac, entries, batch); - spin_lock_init(&alc->lock); + if (alc) { + init_arraycache(&alc->ac, entries, batch); + spin_lock_init(&alc->lock); + } return alc; }