4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
[ Upstream commit 7f073d011f93e92d4d225526b9ab6b8b0bbd6613 ]
The bo array has req->nr_buffers elements so the > should be >= so we don't read beyond the end of the array.
Fixes: a1606a9596e5 ("drm/nouveau: new gem pushbuf interface, bump to 0.0.16") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs bskeggs@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c @@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct n struct nouveau_bo *nvbo; uint32_t data;
- if (unlikely(r->bo_index > req->nr_buffers)) { + if (unlikely(r->bo_index >= req->nr_buffers)) { NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "reloc bo index invalid\n"); ret = -EINVAL; break; @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct n if (b->presumed.valid) continue;
- if (unlikely(r->reloc_bo_index > req->nr_buffers)) { + if (unlikely(r->reloc_bo_index >= req->nr_buffers)) { NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "reloc container bo index invalid\n"); ret = -EINVAL; break;