From: Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit cbc1c998da59687e8bbc4667154a72eead2daf2d ]
xdp_adjust_tail.c calls ASSERT_OK() to check the return value of bpf_prog_test_load(), but the condition is not correct. Fix it.
Fixes: 791cad025051 ("bpf: selftests: Get rid of CHECK macro in xdp_adjust_tail.c") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai xukuohai@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221011120108.782373-7-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c index 009ee37607df..39973ea1ce43 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink(void) );
err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd); - if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink")) + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink")) return;
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow(void) );
err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd); - if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow")) + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow")) return;
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow2(void) );
err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd); - if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow")) + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow")) return;
/* Test case-64 */