The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 24ebec25fb270100e252b19c288e21bd7d8cc7f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon will@kernel.org Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:12:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: hw_breakpoint: Don't invoke overflow handler on uaccess watchpoints
Unprivileged memory accesses generated by the so-called "translated" instructions (e.g. STTR) at EL1 can cause EL0 watchpoints to fire unexpectedly if kernel debugging is enabled. In such cases, the hw_breakpoint logic will invoke the user overflow handler which will typically raise a SIGTRAP back to the current task. This is futile when returning back to the kernel because (a) the signal won't have been delivered and (b) userspace can't handle the thing anyway.
Avoid invoking the user overflow handler for watchpoints triggered by kernel uaccess routines, and instead single-step over the faulting instruction as we would if no overflow handler had been installed.
(Fixes tag identifies the introduction of unprivileged memory accesses, which exposed this latent bug in the hw_breakpoint code)
Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: James Morse james.morse@arm.com Fixes: 57f4959bad0a ("arm64: kernel: Add support for User Access Override") Reported-by: Luis Machado luis.machado@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon will@kernel.org
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 0b727edf4104..af234a1e08b7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -730,6 +730,27 @@ static u64 get_distance_from_watchpoint(unsigned long addr, u64 val, return 0; }
+static int watchpoint_report(struct perf_event *wp, unsigned long addr, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + int step = is_default_overflow_handler(wp); + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(wp); + + info->trigger = addr; + + /* + * If we triggered a user watchpoint from a uaccess routine, then + * handle the stepping ourselves since userspace really can't help + * us with this. + */ + if (!user_mode(regs) && info->ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0) + step = 1; + else + perf_bp_event(wp, regs); + + return step; +} + static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { @@ -739,7 +760,6 @@ static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, u64 val; struct perf_event *wp, **slots; struct debug_info *debug_info; - struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info; struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
slots = this_cpu_ptr(wp_on_reg); @@ -777,25 +797,13 @@ static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, if (dist != 0) continue;
- info = counter_arch_bp(wp); - info->trigger = addr; - perf_bp_event(wp, regs); - - /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */ - if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp)) - step = 1; + step = watchpoint_report(wp, addr, regs); } - if (min_dist > 0 && min_dist != -1) { - /* No exact match found. */ - wp = slots[closest_match]; - info = counter_arch_bp(wp); - info->trigger = addr; - perf_bp_event(wp, regs);
- /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */ - if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp)) - step = 1; - } + /* No exact match found? */ + if (min_dist > 0 && min_dist != -1) + step = watchpoint_report(slots[closest_match], addr, regs); + rcu_read_unlock();
if (!step)