6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yonghong Song yonghong.song@linux.dev
[ Upstream commit c8831bdbfbab672c006a18006d36932a494b2fd6 ]
Daniel Hodges reported a jit error when playing with a sched-ext program. The error message is: unexpected jmp_cond padding: -4 bytes
But further investigation shows the error is actual due to failed convergence. The following are some analysis:
... pass4, final_proglen=4391: ... 20e: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi 211: 74 7d je 0x290 213: 48 8b 77 00 mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rdi+0x0] ... 289: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi 28c: 74 17 je 0x2a5 28e: e9 7f ff ff ff jmp 0x212 293: bf 03 00 00 00 mov edi,0x3
Note that insn at 0x211 is 2-byte cond jump insn for offset 0x7d (-125) and insn at 0x28e is 5-byte jmp insn with offset -129.
pass5, final_proglen=4392: ... 20e: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi 211: 0f 84 80 00 00 00 je 0x297 217: 48 8b 77 00 mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rdi+0x0] ... 28d: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi 290: 74 1a je 0x2ac 292: eb 84 jmp 0x218 294: bf 03 00 00 00 mov edi,0x3
Note that insn at 0x211 is 6-byte cond jump insn now since its offset becomes 0x80 based on previous round (0x293 - 0x213 = 0x80). At the same time, insn at 0x292 is a 2-byte insn since its offset is -124.
pass6 will repeat the same code as in pass4. pass7 will repeat the same code as in pass5, and so on. This will prevent eventual convergence.
Passes 1-14 are with padding = 0. At pass15, padding is 1 and related insn looks like:
211: 0f 84 80 00 00 00 je 0x297 217: 48 8b 77 00 mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rdi+0x0] ... 24d: 48 85 d2 test rdx,rdx
The similar code in pass14: 211: 74 7d je 0x290 213: 48 8b 77 00 mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rdi+0x0] ... 249: 48 85 d2 test rdx,rdx 24c: 74 21 je 0x26f 24e: 48 01 f7 add rdi,rsi ...
Before generating the following insn, 250: 74 21 je 0x273 "padding = 1" enables some checking to ensure nops is either 0 or 4 where #define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp))) nops = INSN_SZ_DIFF - 2
In this specific case, addrs[i] = 0x24e // from pass14 addrs[i-1] = 0x24d // from pass15 prog - temp = 3 // from 'test rdx,rdx' in pass15 so nops = -4 and this triggers the failure.
To fix the issue, we need to break cycles of je <-> jmp. For example, in the above case, we have 211: 74 7d je 0x290 the offset is 0x7d. If 2-byte je insn is generated only if the offset is less than 0x7d (<= 0x7c), the cycle can be break and we can achieve the convergence.
I did some study on other cases like je <-> je, jmp <-> je and jmp <-> jmp which may cause cycles. Those cases are not from actual reproducible cases since it is pretty hard to construct a test case for them. the results show that the offset <= 0x7b (0x7b = 123) should be enough to cover all cases. This patch added a new helper to generate 8-bit cond/uncond jmp insns only if the offset range is [-128, 123].
Reported-by: Daniel Hodges hodgesd@meta.com Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song yonghong.song@linux.dev Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904221251.37109-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 878a4c6dd7565..a50c99e9b5c01 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -58,6 +58,56 @@ static bool is_imm8(int value) return value <= 127 && value >= -128; }
+/* + * Let us limit the positive offset to be <= 123. + * This is to ensure eventual jit convergence For the following patterns: + * ... + * pass4, final_proglen=4391: + * ... + * 20e: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi + * 211: 74 7d je 0x290 + * 213: 48 8b 77 00 mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rdi+0x0] + * ... + * 289: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi + * 28c: 74 17 je 0x2a5 + * 28e: e9 7f ff ff ff jmp 0x212 + * 293: bf 03 00 00 00 mov edi,0x3 + * Note that insn at 0x211 is 2-byte cond jump insn for offset 0x7d (-125) + * and insn at 0x28e is 5-byte jmp insn with offset -129. + * + * pass5, final_proglen=4392: + * ... + * 20e: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi + * 211: 0f 84 80 00 00 00 je 0x297 + * 217: 48 8b 77 00 mov rsi,QWORD PTR [rdi+0x0] + * ... + * 28d: 48 85 ff test rdi,rdi + * 290: 74 1a je 0x2ac + * 292: eb 84 jmp 0x218 + * 294: bf 03 00 00 00 mov edi,0x3 + * Note that insn at 0x211 is 6-byte cond jump insn now since its offset + * becomes 0x80 based on previous round (0x293 - 0x213 = 0x80). + * At the same time, insn at 0x292 is a 2-byte insn since its offset is + * -124. + * + * pass6 will repeat the same code as in pass4 and this will prevent + * eventual convergence. + * + * To fix this issue, we need to break je (2->6 bytes) <-> jmp (5->2 bytes) + * cycle in the above. In the above example je offset <= 0x7c should work. + * + * For other cases, je <-> je needs offset <= 0x7b to avoid no convergence + * issue. For jmp <-> je and jmp <-> jmp cases, jmp offset <= 0x7c should + * avoid no convergence issue. + * + * Overall, let us limit the positive offset for 8bit cond/uncond jmp insn + * to maximum 123 (0x7b). This way, the jit pass can eventually converge. + */ +static bool is_imm8_jmp_offset(int value) +{ + return value <= 123 && value >= -128; +} + static bool is_simm32(s64 value) { return value == (s64)(s32)value; @@ -1774,7 +1824,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off)) return -EFAULT; } jmp_offset = addrs[i + insn->off] - addrs[i]; - if (is_imm8(jmp_offset)) { + if (is_imm8_jmp_offset(jmp_offset)) { if (jmp_padding) { /* To keep the jmp_offset valid, the extra bytes are * padded before the jump insn, so we subtract the @@ -1856,7 +1906,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off)) break; } emit_jmp: - if (is_imm8(jmp_offset)) { + if (is_imm8_jmp_offset(jmp_offset)) { if (jmp_padding) { /* To avoid breaking jmp_offset, the extra bytes * are padded before the actual jmp insn, so