On 2/26/18 1:10 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
Hi.
On pondělí 26. února 2018 20:48:33 CET Greg KH wrote:
Yes, that's fine with me.
What ever happened to this? Do you have a list of patches I should apply? Or a patch series?
Here are BFQ commits that are already merged into Linus' tree:
a78773906147 block, bfq: add requeue-request hook 8a8747dc01ce block, bfq: limit sectors served with interactive weight raising a52a69ea89dc block, bfq: limit tags for writes and async I/O 8993d445df38 block, bfq: fix occurrences of request finish method's old name 8abef10b3de1 bfq-iosched: don't call bfqg_and_blkg_put for ! CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED 0d52af590552 block, bfq: release oom-queue ref to root group on exit 52257ffbfcaf block, bfq: put async queues for root bfq groups too 9b25bd0368d5 block, bfq: remove batches of confusing ifdefs a34b024448eb block, bfq: consider also past I/O in soft real-time detection 4403e4e467c3 block, bfq: remove superfluous check in queue-merging setup 7b8fa3b900a0 block, bfq: let a queue be merged only shortly after starting I/O 1be6e8a964ee block, bfq: check low_latency flag in bfq_bfqq_save_state() 05e902835616 block, bfq: add missing rq_pos_tree update on rq removal f0ba5ea2fe45 block, bfq: increase threshold to deem I/O as random
Paolo, could you please confirm we are not missing anything here?
Guys, this is crazy, I'm not going to ack this for stable backports. This is everything including code cleanups.