6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com
commit ac6542ad92759cda383ad62b4e4cbfc28136abc1 upstream.
bpf_prog_aux->func field might be NULL if program does not have subprograms except for main sub-program. The fixed commit does bpf_prog_aux->func access unconditionally, which might lead to null pointer dereference.
The bug could be triggered by replacing the following BPF program:
SEC("tc") int main_changes(struct __sk_buff *sk) { bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0); return 0; }
With the following BPF program:
SEC("freplace") long changes_pkt_data(struct __sk_buff *sk) { return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, 0); }
bpf_prog_aux instance itself represents the main sub-program, use this property to fix the bug.
Fixes: 81f6d0530ba0 ("bpf: check changes_pkt_data property for extension programs") Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@linaro.org Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202412111822.qGw6tOyB-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman eddyz87@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241212070711.427443-1-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu shung-hsi.yu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -21990,6 +21990,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_v } if (tgt_prog) { struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = tgt_prog->aux; + bool tgt_changes_pkt_data;
if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux) && !bpf_prog_dev_bound_match(prog, tgt_prog)) { @@ -22024,8 +22025,10 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_v "Extension programs should be JITed\n"); return -EINVAL; } - if (prog->aux->changes_pkt_data && - !aux->func[subprog]->aux->changes_pkt_data) { + tgt_changes_pkt_data = aux->func + ? aux->func[subprog]->aux->changes_pkt_data + : aux->changes_pkt_data; + if (prog->aux->changes_pkt_data && !tgt_changes_pkt_data) { bpf_log(log, "Extension program changes packet data, while original does not\n"); return -EINVAL;