From: Wanpeng Li wanpengli@tencent.com
commit 17e433b54393a6269acbcb792da97791fe1592d8 upstream.
After commit d73eb57b80b (KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts), a five years old bug is exposed. Running ebizzy benchmark in three 80 vCPUs VMs on one 80 pCPUs Skylake server, a lot of rcu_sched stall warning splatting in the VMs after stress testing:
INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 4 41 57 62 77} (detected by 15, t=60004 jiffies, g=899, c=898, q=15073) Call Trace: flush_tlb_mm_range+0x68/0x140 tlb_flush_mmu.part.75+0x37/0xe0 tlb_finish_mmu+0x55/0x60 zap_page_range+0x142/0x190 SyS_madvise+0x3cd/0x9c0 system_call_fastpath+0x1c/0x21
swait_active() sustains to be true before finish_swait() is called in kvm_vcpu_block(), voluntarily preempted vCPUs are taken into account by kvm_vcpu_on_spin() loop greatly increases the probability condition kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu) is checked and can be true, when APICv is enabled the yield-candidate vCPU's VMCS RVI field leaks(by vmx_sync_pir_to_irr()) into spinning-on-a-taken-lock vCPU's current VMCS.
This patch fixes it by checking conservatively a subset of events.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: Radim Krčmář rkrcmar@redhat.com Cc: Christian Borntraeger borntraeger@de.ibm.com Cc: Marc Zyngier Marc.Zyngier@arm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 98f4a1467 (KVM: add kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() test to kvm_vcpu_on_spin() loop) Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li wanpengli@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 5 +++++ arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 + arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 6 ++++++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 ++++++ arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 + virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 7 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c @@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vc return !!(v->arch.pending_exceptions) || kvm_request_pending(v); }
+bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu); +} + bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h @@ -1169,6 +1169,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops { int (*update_pi_irte)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq, uint32_t guest_irq, bool set); void (*apicv_post_state_restore)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); + bool (*dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int (*set_hv_timer)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 guest_deadline_tsc, bool *expired); --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -5167,6 +5167,11 @@ static void svm_deliver_avic_intr(struct kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu); }
+static bool svm_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return false; +} + static void svm_ir_list_del(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct amd_iommu_pi_data *pi) { unsigned long flags; @@ -7264,6 +7269,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops __
.pmu_ops = &amd_pmu_ops, .deliver_posted_interrupt = svm_deliver_avic_intr, + .dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt = svm_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt, .update_pi_irte = svm_update_pi_irte, .setup_mce = svm_setup_mce,
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -6096,6 +6096,11 @@ static int vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kv return max_irr; }
+static bool vmx_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return pi_test_on(vcpu_to_pi_desc(vcpu)); +} + static void vmx_load_eoi_exitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *eoi_exit_bitmap) { if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu)) @@ -7662,6 +7667,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops vmx_x86_ops __ .guest_apic_has_interrupt = vmx_guest_apic_has_interrupt, .sync_pir_to_irr = vmx_sync_pir_to_irr, .deliver_posted_interrupt = vmx_deliver_posted_interrupt, + .dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt = vmx_dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt,
.set_tss_addr = vmx_set_tss_addr, .set_identity_map_addr = vmx_set_identity_map_addr, --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -9641,6 +9641,22 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vc return kvm_vcpu_running(vcpu) || kvm_vcpu_has_events(vcpu); }
+bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + if (READ_ONCE(vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted)) + return true; + + if (kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_NMI, vcpu) || + kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu) || + kvm_test_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu)) + return true; + + if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active && kvm_x86_ops->dy_apicv_has_pending_interrupt(vcpu)) + return true; + + return false; +} + bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return vcpu->arch.preempted_in_kernel; --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -871,6 +871,7 @@ void kvm_arch_check_processor_compat(voi int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); +bool kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
#ifndef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC /* --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -2475,6 +2475,29 @@ static bool kvm_vcpu_eligible_for_direct #endif }
+/* + * Unlike kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable, this function is called outside + * a vcpu_load/vcpu_put pair. However, for most architectures + * kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable does not require vcpu_load. + */ +bool __weak kvm_arch_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu); +} + +static bool vcpu_dy_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + if (kvm_arch_dy_runnable(vcpu)) + return true; + +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ASYNC_PF + if (!list_empty_careful(&vcpu->async_pf.done)) + return true; +#endif + + return false; +} + void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me, bool yield_to_kernel_mode) { struct kvm *kvm = me->kvm; @@ -2504,7 +2527,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *m continue; if (vcpu == me) continue; - if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && !kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) + if (swait_active(&vcpu->wq) && !vcpu_dy_runnable(vcpu)) continue; if (yield_to_kernel_mode && !kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(vcpu)) continue;