The patch titled Subject: fs/userfaultfd.c: disable irqs for fault_pending and event locks has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was userfaultfd-disable-irqs-for-fault_pending-and-event-locks.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------ From: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com Subject: fs/userfaultfd.c: disable irqs for fault_pending and event locks
When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on a userfaultfd, aio_poll() disables IRQs and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then userfaultfd_ctx::fd_wqh.lock. This may have to wait for userfaultfd_ctx::fd_wqh.lock to be released by userfaultfd_ctx_read(), which can be waiting for userfaultfd_ctx::fault_pending_wqh.lock or userfaultfd_ctx::event_wqh.lock. But elsewhere the fault_pending_wqh and event_wqh locks are taken with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible.
Fix it by always disabling IRQs when taking the fault_pending_wqh and event_wqh locks.
ae62c16e105a ("userfaultfd: disable irqs when taking the waitqueue lock") didn't fix this because it only accounted for the fd_wqh lock, not the other locks nested inside it.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190627075004.21259-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL") Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers ebiggers@google.com Reported-by: syzbot+fab6de82892b6b9c6191@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+53c0b767f7ca0dc0c451@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+a3accb352f9c22041cfa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Cc: Andrea Arcangeli aarcange@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [4.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-disable-irqs-for-fault_pending-and-event-locks +++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c @@ -40,6 +40,16 @@ enum userfaultfd_state { /* * Start with fault_pending_wqh and fault_wqh so they're more likely * to be in the same cacheline. + * + * Locking order: + * fd_wqh.lock + * fault_pending_wqh.lock + * fault_wqh.lock + * event_wqh.lock + * + * To avoid deadlocks, IRQs must be disabled when taking any of the above locks, + * since fd_wqh.lock is taken by aio_poll() while it's holding a lock that's + * also taken in IRQ context. */ struct userfaultfd_ctx { /* waitqueue head for the pending (i.e. not read) userfaults */ @@ -458,7 +468,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fa blocking_state = return_to_userland ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE : TASK_KILLABLE;
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); /* * After the __add_wait_queue the uwq is visible to userland * through poll/read(). @@ -470,7 +480,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fa * __add_wait_queue. */ set_current_state(blocking_state); - spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vmf->vma)) must_wait = userfaultfd_must_wait(ctx, vmf->address, vmf->flags, @@ -552,13 +562,13 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fa * kernel stack can be released after the list_del_init. */ if (!list_empty_careful(&uwq.wq.entry)) { - spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); /* * No need of list_del_init(), the uwq on the stack * will be freed shortly anyway. */ list_del(&uwq.wq.entry); - spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); }
/* @@ -583,7 +593,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_compl init_waitqueue_entry(&ewq->wq, current); release_new_ctx = NULL;
- spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); /* * After the __add_wait_queue the uwq is visible to userland * through poll/read(). @@ -613,15 +623,15 @@ static void userfaultfd_event_wait_compl break; }
- spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
wake_up_poll(&ctx->fd_wqh, EPOLLIN); schedule();
- spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); } __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock);
if (release_new_ctx) { struct vm_area_struct *vma; @@ -918,10 +928,10 @@ wakeup: * the last page faults that may have been already waiting on * the fault_*wqh. */ - spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); __wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, &range); __wake_up(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, 1, &range); - spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/* Flush pending events that may still wait on event_wqh */ wake_up_all(&ctx->event_wqh); @@ -1134,7 +1144,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(stru
if (!ret && msg->event == UFFD_EVENT_FORK) { ret = resolve_userfault_fork(ctx, fork_nctx, msg); - spin_lock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); if (!list_empty(&fork_event)) { /* * The fork thread didn't abort, so we can @@ -1180,7 +1190,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(stru if (ret) userfaultfd_ctx_put(fork_nctx); } - spin_unlock(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->event_wqh.lock); }
return ret; @@ -1219,14 +1229,14 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_read(struct f static void __wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, struct userfaultfd_wake_range *range) { - spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); /* wake all in the range and autoremove */ if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh)) __wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, range); if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_wqh)) __wake_up(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, 1, range); - spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); }
static __always_inline void wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, @@ -1881,7 +1891,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_show_fdinfo(stru wait_queue_entry_t *wq; unsigned long pending = 0, total = 0;
- spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_pending_wqh.head, entry) { pending++; total++; @@ -1889,7 +1899,7 @@ static void userfaultfd_show_fdinfo(stru list_for_each_entry(wq, &ctx->fault_wqh.head, entry) { total++; } - spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/* * If more protocols will be added, there will be all shown _
Patches currently in -mm which might be from ebiggers@google.com are