6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paul Chaignon paul.chaignon@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 0b91fda3a1f044141e1e615456ff62508c32b202 ]
Prior to this patch, the mark is sanitized (applying the state's mask to the state's value) only on inserts when checking if a conflicting XFRM state or policy exists.
We discovered in Cilium that this same sanitization does not occur in the hot-path __xfrm_state_lookup. In the hot-path, the sk_buff's mark is simply compared to the state's value:
if ((mark & x->mark.m) != x->mark.v) continue;
Therefore, users can define unsanitized marks (ex. 0xf42/0xf00) which will never match any packet.
This commit updates __xfrm_state_insert and xfrm_policy_insert to store the sanitized marks, thus removing this footgun.
This has the side effect of changing the ip output, as the returned mark will have the mask applied to it when printed.
Fixes: 3d6acfa7641f ("xfrm: SA lookups with mark") Signed-off-by: Paul Chaignon paul.chaignon@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Louis DeLosSantos louis.delos.devel@gmail.com Co-developed-by: Louis DeLosSantos louis.delos.devel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert steffen.klassert@secunet.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 3 +++ net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index 8a1b83191a6cd..2c42d83fbaa2d 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -1581,6 +1581,9 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl) struct xfrm_policy *delpol; struct hlist_head *chain;
+ /* Sanitize mark before store */ + policy->mark.v &= policy->mark.m; + spin_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock); chain = policy_hash_bysel(net, &policy->selector, policy->family, dir); if (chain) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c index a526b3bb8b88e..abd725386cb60 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c @@ -1653,6 +1653,9 @@ static void __xfrm_state_insert(struct xfrm_state *x)
list_add(&x->km.all, &net->xfrm.state_all);
+ /* Sanitize mark before store */ + x->mark.v &= x->mark.m; + h = xfrm_dst_hash(net, &x->id.daddr, &x->props.saddr, x->props.reqid, x->props.family); XFRM_STATE_INSERT(bydst, &x->bydst, net->xfrm.state_bydst + h,