On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 04:02:27PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 3:50 PM Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 3:06 PM Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 01:59:10PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
...
Fixes?
This has always been like that.
Reported?
I mean, technically Mark Brown reported my previous patch failing but I don't think we do this if we're still within the same series just another iteration?
Closes?
Ditto.
I meant that this fixes a potential issue disregard to your series, right?
No, as long as the imx driver keeps putting stuff into the pin function radix tree directly, this cannot happen. The issue was triggered by the discrepancy between the number of added selectors and the hardcoded number of functions (we started at 0 which was not in the radix tree and crashed before we got to 1).
Ah, thanks for the explanation. The problem is that current commit message implies a (potential) but lurking somewhere (regardless IMX case). Can you amend it to make more explicit that there is no bug right now.