From: Jiasheng Jiang jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn
commit 40c67c291a93f8846c4a972c9ef1b7ba4544c8d0 upstream.
Because of the possible failure of the dma_supported(), the dma_set_mask_and_coherent() may return error num. Therefore, it should be better to check it and return the error if fails. And since the sdhci_setup_host() has already checked the return value of the enable_dma, we need not check it in sdhci_resume_host() again.
Fixes: 5552d7ad596c ("mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set proper dma mask for ls104x chips") Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn Acked-by: Adrian Hunter adrian.hunter@intel.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220112083156.1124782-1-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson ulf.hansson@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c @@ -472,12 +472,16 @@ static void esdhc_of_adma_workaround(str
static int esdhc_of_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host) { + int ret; u32 value; struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc);
if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc") || - of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) - dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); + of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) { + ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40)); + if (ret) + return ret; + }
value = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL);