From: Chris Mason clm@fb.com
commit deccae40e4b30f98837e44225194d80c8baf2233 upstream.
Commit 619104ba453ad0 ("btrfs: move common NOCOW checks against a file extent into a helper") changed our call to btrfs_cross_ref_exist() to always pass false for the 'strict' parameter. We're passing this down through the stack so that we can do a full check for cross references during swapfile activation.
With strict always false, this test fails:
btrfs subvol create swappy chattr +C swappy fallocate -l1G swappy/swapfile chmod 600 swappy/swapfile mkswap swappy/swapfile
btrfs subvol snap swappy swapsnap btrfs subvol del -C swapsnap
btrfs fi sync / sync;sync;sync
swapon swappy/swapfile
The fix is to just use args->strict, and everyone except swapfile activation is passing false.
Fixes: 619104ba453ad0 ("btrfs: move common NOCOW checks against a file extent into a helper") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana fdmanana@suse.com Signed-off-by: Chris Mason clm@fb.com Signed-off-by: David Sterba dsterba@suse.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ static int can_nocow_file_extent(struct
ret = btrfs_cross_ref_exist(root, btrfs_ino(inode), key->offset - args->extent_offset, - args->disk_bytenr, false, path); + args->disk_bytenr, args->strict, path); WARN_ON_ONCE(ret > 0 && is_freespace_inode); if (ret != 0) goto out;