From: Michal Hocko mhocko@suse.com Subject: memcg, oom: notify on oom killer invocation from the charge path
Burt Holzman has noticed that memcg v1 doesn't notify about OOM events via eventfd anymore. The reason is that 29ef680ae7c2 ("memcg, oom: move out_of_memory back to the charge path") has moved the oom handling back to the charge path. While doing so the notification was left behind in mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize.
Fix the issue by replicating the oom hierarchy locking and the notification.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181224091107.18354-1-mhocko@kernel.org Fixes: 29ef680ae7c2 ("memcg, oom: move out_of_memory back to the charge path") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko mhocko@suse.com Reported-by: Burt Holzman burt@fnal.gov Acked-by: Johannes Weiner hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [4.19+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~memcg-oom-notify-on-oom-killer-invocation-from-the-charge-path +++ a/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1673,6 +1673,9 @@ enum oom_status {
static enum oom_status mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order) { + enum oom_status ret; + bool locked; + if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) return OOM_SKIPPED;
@@ -1707,10 +1710,23 @@ static enum oom_status mem_cgroup_oom(st return OOM_ASYNC; }
+ mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg); + + locked = mem_cgroup_oom_trylock(memcg); + + if (locked) + mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg); + + mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg); if (mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask, order)) - return OOM_SUCCESS; + ret = OOM_SUCCESS; + else + ret = OOM_FAILED; + + if (locked) + mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg);
- return OOM_FAILED; + return ret; }
/** _