4 May
2020
4 May
'20
4:03 p.m.
On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:20:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
Err, why does i915 implements its own uncached memcpy instead of relying on core functionality to start with?
What is this core functionality that provides movntqda?
A sensible name might be memcpy_uncached or mempcy_nontemporal. But the important point is that this should be arch code with a common fallback rather than hacking it up in drivers.