6.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tyrel Datwyler tyreld@linux.ibm.com
[ Upstream commit 670106eb4c8b23475f8c2b3416005a312afa622f ]
Commit 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup") wrongly changed the busy loop check to use rtas_busy_delay() instead of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). The busy return codes for RTAS and hypercalls are not the same.
Fix this issue by restoring the use of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY().
Fixes: 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ during cleanup") Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler tyreld@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921225435.3537728-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Brian King brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen martin.petersen@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c index ce9eb00e2ca04..470e8e6c41b62 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ #include <linux/bsg-lib.h> #include <asm/firmware.h> #include <asm/irq.h> -#include <asm/rtas.h> #include <asm/vio.h> #include <scsi/scsi.h> #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h> @@ -5804,7 +5803,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost, irq_failed: do { rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie); - } while (rtas_busy_delay(rc)); + } while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc)); reg_failed: LEAVE; return rc;