The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From aa6f8dcbab473f3a3c7454b74caa46d36cdc5d13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Halil Pasic pasic@linux.ibm.com Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 18:07:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"
Unfortunately, we ended up merging an old version of the patch "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE" instead of merging the latest one. Christoph (the swiotlb maintainer), he asked me to create an incremental fix (after I have pointed this out the mix up, and asked him for guidance). So here we go.
The main differences between what we got and what was agreed are: * swiotlb_sync_single_for_device is also required to do an extra bounce * We decided not to introduce DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE until we have exploiters * The implantation of DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE is flawed: DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE must take precedence over DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC
Thus this patch removes DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE, and makes swiotlb_sync_single_for_device() bounce unconditionally (that is, also when dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE) in order do avoid synchronising back stale data from the swiotlb buffer.
Let me note, that if the size used with dma_sync_* API is less than the size used with dma_[un]map_*, under certain circumstances we may still end up with swiotlb not being transparent. In that sense, this is no perfect fix either.
To get this bullet proof, we would have to bounce the entire mapping/bounce buffer. For that we would have to figure out the starting address, and the size of the mapping in swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(). While this does seem possible, there seems to be no firm consensus on how things are supposed to work.
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic pasic@linux.ibm.com Fixes: ddbd89deb7d3 ("swiotlb: fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst index 17706dc91ec9..1887d92e8e92 100644 --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileged "supervisor" and unprivileged subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. diff --git a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h index 6150d11a607e..dca2b1355bb1 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -61,14 +61,6 @@ */ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9)
-/* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - /* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c index bfc56cb21705..6db1c475ec82 100644 --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -627,10 +627,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr, for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; }
@@ -697,10 +701,13 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, void swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir) { - if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else - BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + /* + * Unconditional bounce is necessary to avoid corruption on + * sync_*_for_cpu or dma_ummap_* when the device didn't overwrite + * the whole lengt of the bounce buffer. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + BUG_ON(!valid_dma_direction(dir)); }
void swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,