On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 12:36:36PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:26 PM Rob Herring robh@kernel.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:45 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:24 PM Saravana Kannan saravanak@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:10 PM Rob Herring robh@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 7:46 PM Saravana Kannan saravanak@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:34 PM Rob Herring robh@kernel.org wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 04:09:10PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 3:26 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy > > ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > [<vendor>,]nr-gpios property is used by some GPIO drivers[0] to indicate > > > the number of GPIOs present on a system, not define a GPIO. nr-gpios is > > > not configured by #gpio-cells and can't be parsed along with other > > > "*-gpios" properties. > > > > > > nr-gpios without the "<vendor>," prefix is not allowed by the DT > > > spec[1], so only add exception for the ",nr-gpios" suffix and let the > > > error message continue being printed for non-compliant implementations. > > > > > > [0]: nr-gpios is referenced in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio: > > > - gpio-adnp.txt > > > - gpio-xgene-sb.txt > > > - gpio-xlp.txt > > > - snps,dw-apb-gpio.yaml > > > > > > [1]: > > > Link: https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/cb53a16a1eb3e2169ce170c071e... > > > > > > Fixes errors such as: > > > OF: /palmbus@300000/gpio@600: could not find phandle > > > > > > Fixes: 7f00be96f125 ("of: property: Add device link support for interrupt-parent, dmas and -gpio(s)") > > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Lipnitskiy ilya.lipnitskiy@gmail.com > > > Cc: Saravana Kannan saravanak@google.com > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5.x > > > --- > > > drivers/of/property.c | 11 ++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c > > > index 2046ae311322..1793303e84ac 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/of/property.c > > > +++ b/drivers/of/property.c > > > @@ -1281,7 +1281,16 @@ DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl7, "pinctrl-7", NULL) > > > DEFINE_SIMPLE_PROP(pinctrl8, "pinctrl-8", NULL) > > > DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(regulators, "-supply", NULL) > > > DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpio, "-gpio", "#gpio-cells") > > > -DEFINE_SUFFIX_PROP(gpios, "-gpios", "#gpio-cells") > > > + > > > +static struct device_node *parse_gpios(struct device_node *np, > > > + const char *prop_name, int index) > > > +{ > > > + if (!strcmp_suffix(prop_name, ",nr-gpios")) > > > + return NULL; > > > > Ah I somehow missed this patch. This gives a blanked exception for > > vendor,nr-gpios. I'd prefer explicit exceptions for all the instances > > of ",nr-gpios" we are grandfathering in. Any future additions should > > be rejected. Can we do that please? > > > > Rob, you okay with making this list more explicit? > > Not the kernel's job IMO. A schema is the right way to handle that.
Ok, that's fine by me. Btw, let's land this in driver-core? I've made changes there and this might cause conflicts. Not sure.
It merges with linux-next fine. You'll need to resend this to Greg if you want to do that.
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
Hi Greg,
Can you pull this into driver-core please?
Do you want me to re-spin on top of driver-core? The patch is currently based on dt/next in robh/linux.git
I did say you need to resend the patch to Greg, but since there's no movement on this and I have other things to send upstream, I've applied it.
:'(
If it's not too late, can we please drop it? I'm sure Greg would be okay with picking this up.
It's in Linus's tree, why does it matter who sends it in?
{sigh}