[ Upstream commit 652b8b086538c8a10de5aa5cbdaef79333b46358 ]
GPD has done it again, make a nice device (good), use way too generic DMI strings (bad) and use a portrait screen rotated 90 degrees (ugly).
Because of the too generic DMI strings this entry is also doing bios-date matching, so the gpd_micropc data struct may very well need to be updated with some extra bios-dates in the future.
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard maxime.ripard@bootlin.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190524125759.14131-2-hdegoed... (cherry picked from commit f2f2bb60d998abde10de7e483ef9e17639892450) Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c index 019f148d5a78..dd982563304d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c @@ -42,6 +42,14 @@ static const struct drm_dmi_panel_orientation_data asus_t100ha = { .orientation = DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_LEFT_UP, };
+static const struct drm_dmi_panel_orientation_data gpd_micropc = { + .width = 720, + .height = 1280, + .bios_dates = (const char * const []){ "04/26/2019", + NULL }, + .orientation = DRM_MODE_PANEL_ORIENTATION_RIGHT_UP, +}; + static const struct drm_dmi_panel_orientation_data gpd_pocket = { .width = 1200, .height = 1920, @@ -101,6 +109,14 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = { DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "T100HAN"), }, .driver_data = (void *)&asus_t100ha, + }, { /* GPD MicroPC (generic strings, also match on bios date) */ + .matches = { + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Default string"), + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Default string"), + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Default string"), + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "Default string"), + }, + .driver_data = (void *)&gpd_micropc, }, { /* * GPD Pocket, note that the the DMI data is less generic then * it seems, devices with a board-vendor of "AMI Corporation"