From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz luiz.von.dentz@intel.com
[ Upstream commit f7b94bdc1ec107c92262716b073b3e816d4784fb ]
Attemting to do sock_lock on .recvmsg may cause a deadlock as shown bellow, so instead of using sock_sock this uses sk_receive_queue.lock on bt_sock_ioctl to avoid the UAF:
INFO: task kworker/u9:1:121 blocked for more than 30 seconds. Not tainted 6.7.6-lemon #183 Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work Call Trace: <TASK> __schedule+0x37d/0xa00 schedule+0x32/0xe0 __lock_sock+0x68/0xa0 ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 lock_sock_nested+0x43/0x50 l2cap_sock_recv_cb+0x21/0xa0 l2cap_recv_frame+0x55b/0x30a0 ? psi_task_switch+0xeb/0x270 ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x93/0x2a0 hci_rx_work+0x33a/0x3f0 process_one_work+0x13a/0x2f0 worker_thread+0x2f0/0x410 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe0/0x110 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK>
Fixes: 2e07e8348ea4 ("Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: Fix Use-After-Free in bt_sock_recvmsg") Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz luiz.von.dentz@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c index b93464ac3517f..67604ccec2f42 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c @@ -309,14 +309,11 @@ int bt_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, if (flags & MSG_OOB) return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- lock_sock(sk); - skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err); if (!skb) { if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) err = 0;
- release_sock(sk); return err; }
@@ -346,8 +343,6 @@ int bt_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
skb_free_datagram(sk, skb);
- release_sock(sk); - if (flags & MSG_TRUNC) copied = skblen;
@@ -570,10 +565,11 @@ int bt_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) if (sk->sk_state == BT_LISTEN) return -EINVAL;
- lock_sock(sk); + spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); amount = skb ? skb->len : 0; - release_sock(sk); + spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + err = put_user(amount, (int __user *)arg); break;