29 May
2025
29 May
'25
6:16 p.m.
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 7:02 PM David Lechner dlechner@baylibre.com wrote:
On 5/24/25 5:34 AM, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
...
fxls8962af_suspend() calls enable_irq_wake(data->irq); before disabling the interrupt by calling fxls8962af_buffer_predisable(indio_dev);
It seems like the order should be reversed.
AFAIU the wake capability of IRQ line is orthogonal to the interrupt controller enabling (unmasking) / disabling (masking) the line itself. Or did you mean something else?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko