6.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ching-Te Ku ku920601@realtek.com
[ Upstream commit a36230aa5f5efceaf5f81682673732a921b91518 ]
This report will feedback some basic information from firmware(PTA counter, report counter, mailbox counter etc). And the report version need to match driver & firmware both side. The original logic break the switch case logic before driver update the report version. It made the report can not be parsed correctly. Delete the break at the version 7 and 8. Add logic to count C2H event report.
Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku ku920601@realtek.com Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih pkshih@realtek.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250308025832.10400-3-pkshih@realtek.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c index 68316d44b2043..9e06cc36a75e2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c @@ -1372,11 +1372,9 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, } else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 8) { pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v8; pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v8); - break; } else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 7) { pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v7; pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v7); - break; } else { goto err; } @@ -8115,6 +8113,7 @@ void rtw89_btc_c2h_handle(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, return;
func = rtw89_btc_c2h_get_index_by_ver(rtwdev, func); + pfwinfo->cnt_c2h++;
switch (func) { case BTF_EVNT_BUF_OVERFLOW: