The patch below does not apply to the 6.2-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-6.2.y git checkout FETCH_HEAD git cherry-pick -x c90b155148e9632ae46e6778ee958c319457415f # <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.> git commit -s git send-email --to 'stable@vger.kernel.org' --in-reply-to '16784487941276@kroah.com' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 6.2.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
c90b155148e9 ("drm/i915: Pick the backlight controller based on VBT on ICP+")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From c90b155148e9632ae46e6778ee958c319457415f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 08:43:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Pick the backlight controller based on VBT on ICP+ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Use the second backlight controller on ICP+ if the VBT asks us to do so.
On pre-MTP we also check the chicken bit to make sure the pins have been correctly muxed by the firmware.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8016 Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230207064337.18697-4-ville.s... Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com (cherry picked from commit b33771546309b46b681388b3540b69a75a0e2e69) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c index 5b7da72c95b8..a4e4b7f79e4d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_backlight.c @@ -1431,6 +1431,30 @@ bxt_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe unused) return 0; }
+static int cnp_num_backlight_controllers(struct drm_i915_private *i915) +{ + if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_DG1) + return 1; + + if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_ICP) + return 2; + + return 1; +} + +static bool cnp_backlight_controller_is_valid(struct drm_i915_private *i915, int controller) +{ + if (controller < 0 || controller >= cnp_num_backlight_controllers(i915)) + return false; + + if (controller == 1 && + INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) >= PCH_ICP && + INTEL_PCH_TYPE(i915) < PCH_MTP) + return intel_de_read(i915, SOUTH_CHICKEN1) & ICP_SECOND_PPS_IO_SELECT; + + return true; +} + static int cnp_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe unused) { @@ -1440,10 +1464,14 @@ cnp_setup_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector, enum pipe unused)
/* * CNP has the BXT implementation of backlight, but with only one - * controller. TODO: ICP has multiple controllers but we only use - * controller 0 for now. + * controller. ICP+ can have two controllers, depending on pin muxing. */ - panel->backlight.controller = 0; + panel->backlight.controller = connector->panel.vbt.backlight.controller; + if (!cnp_backlight_controller_is_valid(i915, panel->backlight.controller)) { + drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Invalid backlight controller %d, assuming 0\n", + panel->backlight.controller); + panel->backlight.controller = 0; + }
pwm_ctl = intel_de_read(i915, BXT_BLC_PWM_CTL(panel->backlight.controller));