On 22.05.23 10:17, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 17.04.23 13:25, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
[adding Matthias to the list of recipients, who back then applied to culprit]
Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
AngeloGioacchino, Has any progress been made to fix below regression? It doesn't look like it from here, hence I wondered if it fall through the cracks.
Hmmm, nobody replied. Does nobody (including the reporters!) care anymore for valid reasons? Then I'd drop this from the tracking.
#regzbot inconclusive: it seems nobody (including the reporters) does care anymore #regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
Or was progress made and I just missed it?
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
On 27.03.23 10:23, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 26/03/23 15:23, Bagas Sanjaya ha scritto:
On 3/26/23 02:20, Tobias Dahms wrote:
Hello,
the bisection gives following result:
18c7deca2b812537aa4d928900e208710f1300aa is the first bad commit commit 18c7deca2b812537aa4d928900e208710f1300aa Author: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com Date: Tue May 17 12:47:08 2022 +0200
soc: mediatek: pwrap: Use readx_poll_timeout() instead of custom function
Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do. Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead use the read_poll_timeout macro.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado nfraprado@collabora.com Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado nfraprado@collabora.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220517104712.24579-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@c... Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger matthias.bgg@gmail.com
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
OK, I'm updating the regression status:
#regzbot introduced: 18c7deca2b8125
And for replying, don't top-post, but rather reply inline with appropriate context instead; hence I cut the replied context.
There are two possible solutions to that, specifically, either: 1. Change readx_poll_timeout() to readx_poll_timeout_atomic(); or 2. Fix the mt6323-led driver so that this operation gets done out of atomic context, which is IMO the option to prefer.
Ideas?
Regards, Angelo