From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
[ Upstream commit 3b7180573c250eb6e2a7eec54ae91f27472332ea ]
In the CPU removal path the ->offline() callback provided by the driver is always invoked before ->exit(), but in the cpufreq_online() error path it is not, so ->exit() is expected to somehow know the context in which it has been called and act accordingly.
That is less than straightforward, so make cpufreq_online() invoke the driver's ->offline() callback, if present, on errors before ->exit() too.
This only potentially affects intel_pstate.
Fixes: 91a12e91dc39 ("cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down and bring up of CPUs") Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Acked-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 802abc925b2a..cbab834c37a0 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1367,9 +1367,14 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) goto out_free_policy; }
+ /* + * The initialization has succeeded and the policy is online. + * If there is a problem with its frequency table, take it + * offline and drop it. + */ ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort(policy); if (ret) - goto out_exit_policy; + goto out_offline_policy;
/* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */ cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus); @@ -1515,6 +1520,10 @@ out_destroy_policy:
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+out_offline_policy: + if (cpufreq_driver->offline) + cpufreq_driver->offline(policy); + out_exit_policy: if (cpufreq_driver->exit) cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);