Re: [PATCH] Documentation: process: Describe kernel version prefix for third option

On 11/1/22 20:30, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

No, sorry, this is not needed and does not have to be in the subject line at all.

The current wording is fine, it's just that people don't always read it.

so consider this a NAK.

Hi Greg,

There was a case when a submitter submitted multiple backports (which qualified for third option) without specifying the prefix, hence a reviewer complained [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221101074351.GA8310@amd/