Em Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:58:54PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju escreveu:
Hi Sasha, Arnaldo.
Between v5.2.16 and acme HEAD, struct perf_evlist to struct evlist and struct perf_evsel to struct evsel.
However the patches that I had posted http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190904094738.9558-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com would apply cleanly to v5.2.16.
I would like to check if the backports to v5.2.16 should be the same patch (i.e include dependencies including struct renames) or is it okay to apply without the dependencies. Please advise.
Because the renames affected a lot of files, it throws up a lot of commits as dependencies. So I would wait for your inputs before I start with the work.
Better to not drag the renames, just use the original patch, I think its the best path forward (well, backward :)).
- Arnaldo
-- Thanks and Regards Srikar
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.16, v4.19.74, v4.14.145, v4.9.193, v4.4.193.
v5.2.16: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 1c839a5a4061 ("perf cs-etm: Configure timestamp generation in CPU-wide mode") 32dcd021d004 ("perf evsel: Rename struct perf_evsel to struct evsel") 3399ad9ac234 ("perf cs-etm: Configure contextID tracing in CPU-wide mode") acae8b36cded ("perf header: Add die information in CPU topology") b74d8686a18b ("perf cpumap: Retrieve die id information") db5742b6849e ("perf stat: Support per-die aggregation") f854839ba2a5 ("perf cpu_map: Rename struct cpu_map to struct perf_cpu_map")
-- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju