5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Leon Hwang hffilwlqm@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 96daa9874211d5497aa70fa409b67afc29f0cb86 ]
Get and check data_fd. It should not check map_fd again.
Meanwhile, correct some 'return' to 'goto out'.
Thank the suggestion from Maciej in "bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop"[0] discussions.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/e496aef8-1f80-0f8e-dcdd-25a8c300319a@gmail.com/T...
Fixes: 79d49ba048ec ("bpf, testing: Add various tail call test cases") Fixes: 3b0379111197 ("selftests/bpf: Add tailcall_bpf2bpf tests") Fixes: 5e0b0a4c52d3 ("selftests/bpf: Test tail call counting with bpf2bpf and data on stack") Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang hffilwlqm@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230906154256.95461-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau martin.lau@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 32 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c index b7b9f28e1c3dd..28e30ad4a30e8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c @@ -272,11 +272,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_3(void)
data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out;
data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out;
i = 0; err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val); @@ -334,11 +334,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_4(void)
data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out;
data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out;
for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__def(prog_array)->max_entries; i++) { snprintf(prog_name, sizeof(prog_name), "classifier/%i", i); @@ -422,11 +422,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_5(void)
data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out;
data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out;
for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__def(prog_array)->max_entries; i++) { snprintf(prog_name, sizeof(prog_name), "classifier/%i", i); @@ -610,11 +610,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_2(void)
data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out;
data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out;
i = 0; err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(data_fd, &i, &val); @@ -783,11 +783,11 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_4(bool noise)
data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "tailcall.bss"); if (CHECK_FAIL(!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map))) - return; + goto out;
data_fd = bpf_map__fd(data_map); - if (CHECK_FAIL(map_fd < 0)) - return; + if (CHECK_FAIL(data_fd < 0)) + goto out;
i = 0; val.noise = noise; @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_6(void) ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "tailcall retval");
data_fd = bpf_map__fd(obj->maps.bss); - if (!ASSERT_GE(map_fd, 0, "bss map fd")) + if (!ASSERT_GE(data_fd, 0, "bss map fd")) goto out;
i = 0;