4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Myron Stowe myron.stowe@redhat.com
commit 3dbe97efe8bf450b183d6dee2305cbc032e6b8a4 upstream.
PCIe r4.0, sec 9.3.5.4, "Device Control Register", shows both Max_Payload_Size (MPS) and Max_Read_request_Size (MRRS) to be 'RsvdP' for VFs. Just prior to the table it states:
"PF and VF functionality is defined in Section 7.5.3.4 except where noted in Table 9-16. For VF fields marked 'RsvdP', the PF setting applies to the VF."
All of which implies that with respect to Max_Payload_Size Supported (MPSS), MPS, and MRRS values, we should not be paying any attention to the VF's fields, but rather only to the PF's. Only looking at the PF's fields also logically makes sense as it's the sole physical interface to the PCIe bus.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200527 Fixes: 27d868b5e6cf ("PCI: Set MPS to match upstream bridge") Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe myron.stowe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas bhelgaas@google.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.3+ Cc: Keith Busch keith.busch@intel.com Cc: Sinan Kaya okaya@kernel.org Cc: Dongdong Liu liudongdong3@huawei.com Cc: Jon Mason jdmason@kudzu.us Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- drivers/pci/probe.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c @@ -1677,6 +1677,10 @@ static void pci_configure_mps(struct pci if (!pci_is_pcie(dev) || !bridge || !pci_is_pcie(bridge)) return;
+ /* MPS and MRRS fields are of type 'RsvdP' for VFs, short-circuit out */ + if (dev->is_virtfn) + return; + mps = pcie_get_mps(dev); p_mps = pcie_get_mps(bridge);