From: Eric Sandeen sandeen@redhat.com
commit e445976537ad139162980bee015b7364e5b64fff upstream.
This ASSERT in xfs_rename is a) incorrect, because (RENAME_WHITEOUT|RENAME_NOREPLACE) is a valid combination, and b) unnecessary, because actual invalid flag combinations are already handled at the vfs level in do_renameat2() before we get called. So, remove it.
Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen sandeen@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org Fixes: 7dcf5c3e4527 ("xfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT support") Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima kuniyu@amazon.com Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong djwong@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c @@ -2964,7 +2964,6 @@ xfs_rename( * appropriately. */ if (flags & RENAME_WHITEOUT) { - ASSERT(!(flags & (RENAME_NOREPLACE | RENAME_EXCHANGE))); error = xfs_rename_alloc_whiteout(target_dp, &wip); if (error) return error;