5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Maksym Planeta maksym@exostellar.io
[ Upstream commit 6d002348789bc16e9203e9818b7a3688787e3b29 ]
Function xen_pin_page calls xen_pte_lock, which in turn grab page table lock (ptlock). When locking, xen_pte_lock expect mm->page_table_lock to be held before grabbing ptlock, but this does not happen when pinning is caused by xen_mm_pin_all.
This commit addresses lockdep warning below, which shows up when suspending a Xen VM.
[ 3680.658422] Freezing user space processes [ 3680.660156] Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds) [ 3680.660182] OOM killer disabled. [ 3680.660192] Freezing remaining freezable tasks [ 3680.661485] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds) [ 3680.685254] [ 3680.685265] ================================== [ 3680.685269] WARNING: Nested lock was not taken [ 3680.685274] 6.12.0+ #16 Tainted: G W [ 3680.685279] ---------------------------------- [ 3680.685283] migration/0/19 is trying to lock: [ 3680.685288] ffff88800bac33c0 (ptlock_ptr(ptdesc)#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685303] [ 3680.685303] but this task is not holding: [ 3680.685308] init_mm.page_table_lock [ 3680.685311] [ 3680.685311] stack backtrace: [ 3680.685316] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 19 Comm: migration/0 Tainted: G W 6.12.0+ #16 [ 3680.685324] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 3680.685328] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x120 <- __stop_cpus.constprop.0+0x8c/0xd0 [ 3680.685339] Call Trace: [ 3680.685344] <TASK> [ 3680.685347] dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0 [ 3680.685356] __lock_acquire+0x917/0x2310 [ 3680.685364] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0 [ 3680.685369] ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685373] _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock+0x2f/0x70 [ 3680.685381] ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685386] xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685390] ? __pfx_xen_pin_page+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685394] __xen_pgd_walk+0x233/0x2c0 [ 3680.685401] ? stop_one_cpu+0x91/0x100 [ 3680.685405] __xen_pgd_pin+0x5d/0x250 [ 3680.685410] xen_mm_pin_all+0x70/0xa0 [ 3680.685415] xen_pv_pre_suspend+0xf/0x280 [ 3680.685420] xen_suspend+0x57/0x1a0 [ 3680.685428] multi_cpu_stop+0x6b/0x120 [ 3680.685432] ? update_cpumasks_hier+0x7c/0xa60 [ 3680.685439] ? __pfx_multi_cpu_stop+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685443] cpu_stopper_thread+0x8c/0x140 [ 3680.685448] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x20/0x1f0 [ 3680.685454] ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685458] smpboot_thread_fn+0xed/0x1f0 [ 3680.685462] kthread+0xde/0x110 [ 3680.685467] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685471] ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50 [ 3680.685478] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685482] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 3680.685489] </TASK> [ 3680.685491] [ 3680.685491] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3680.685497] 1 lock held by migration/0/19: [ 3680.685500] #0: ffffffff8284df38 (pgd_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xen_mm_pin_all+0x14/0xa0 [ 3680.685512] [ 3680.685512] stack backtrace: [ 3680.685518] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 19 Comm: migration/0 Tainted: G W 6.12.0+ #16 [ 3680.685528] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 3680.685531] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x120 <- __stop_cpus.constprop.0+0x8c/0xd0 [ 3680.685538] Call Trace: [ 3680.685541] <TASK> [ 3680.685544] dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0 [ 3680.685549] __lock_acquire+0x93c/0x2310 [ 3680.685554] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0 [ 3680.685558] ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685562] _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock+0x2f/0x70 [ 3680.685568] ? xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685572] xen_pin_page+0x175/0x1d0 [ 3680.685578] ? __pfx_xen_pin_page+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685582] __xen_pgd_walk+0x233/0x2c0 [ 3680.685588] ? stop_one_cpu+0x91/0x100 [ 3680.685592] __xen_pgd_pin+0x5d/0x250 [ 3680.685596] xen_mm_pin_all+0x70/0xa0 [ 3680.685600] xen_pv_pre_suspend+0xf/0x280 [ 3680.685607] xen_suspend+0x57/0x1a0 [ 3680.685611] multi_cpu_stop+0x6b/0x120 [ 3680.685615] ? update_cpumasks_hier+0x7c/0xa60 [ 3680.685620] ? __pfx_multi_cpu_stop+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685625] cpu_stopper_thread+0x8c/0x140 [ 3680.685629] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x20/0x1f0 [ 3680.685634] ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685638] smpboot_thread_fn+0xed/0x1f0 [ 3680.685642] kthread+0xde/0x110 [ 3680.685645] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685649] ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50 [ 3680.685654] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 3680.685657] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 3680.685662] </TASK> [ 3680.685267] xen:grant_table: Grant tables using version 1 layout [ 3680.685921] OOM killer enabled. [ 3680.685934] Restarting tasks ... done.
Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta maksym@exostellar.io Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com Message-ID: 20241204103516.3309112-1-maksym@exostellar.io Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c index b294ae8e44aa9..a87eb84724c2a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.c @@ -807,6 +807,7 @@ void xen_mm_pin_all(void) { struct page *page;
+ spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock); spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) { @@ -817,6 +818,7 @@ void xen_mm_pin_all(void) }
spin_unlock(&pgd_lock); + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock); }
static void __init xen_mark_pinned(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page *page, @@ -914,6 +916,7 @@ void xen_mm_unpin_all(void) { struct page *page;
+ spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock); spin_lock(&pgd_lock);
list_for_each_entry(page, &pgd_list, lru) { @@ -925,6 +928,7 @@ void xen_mm_unpin_all(void) }
spin_unlock(&pgd_lock); + spin_unlock(&init_mm.page_table_lock); }
static void xen_activate_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next)