6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Huang jinhuieric.huang@amd.com
[ Upstream commit 93aa919ca05bec544b17ee9a1bfe394ce6c94bd8 ]
When it only allocates vram without va, which is 0, and a SVM range allocated stays in this range, the vram allocation returns failure. It should be skipped for this case from SVM usage check.
Signed-off-by: Eric Huang jinhuieric.huang@amd.com Reviewed-by: Harish Kasiviswanathan Harish.Kasiviswanathan@amd.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c index fc473e3ba2d00..7fbbc67adfd9e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_chardev.c @@ -1069,7 +1069,12 @@ static int kfd_ioctl_alloc_memory_of_gpu(struct file *filep, svm_range_list_lock_and_flush_work(&p->svms, current->mm); mutex_lock(&p->svms.lock); mmap_write_unlock(current->mm); - if (interval_tree_iter_first(&p->svms.objects, + + /* Skip a special case that allocates VRAM without VA, + * VA will be invalid of 0. + */ + if (!(!args->va_addr && (flags & KFD_IOC_ALLOC_MEM_FLAGS_VRAM)) && + interval_tree_iter_first(&p->svms.objects, args->va_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT, (args->va_addr + args->size - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)) { pr_err("Address: 0x%llx already allocated by SVM\n",