From: Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com
commit b5871dca250cd391885218b99cc015aca1a51aea upstream.
Instead of having the mov32 with aux->alu_limit - 1 immediate, move this operation to retrieve_ptr_limit() instead to simplify the logic and to allow for subsequent sanity boundary checks inside retrieve_ptr_limit(). This avoids in future that at the time of the verifier masking rewrite we'd run into an underflow which would not sign extend due to the nature of mov32 instruction.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk piotras@gmail.com Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov ast@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2740,16 +2740,16 @@ static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const stru case PTR_TO_STACK: off = ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value; if (mask_to_left) - *ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off + 1; + *ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off; else - *ptr_limit = -off; + *ptr_limit = -off - 1; return 0; case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: if (mask_to_left) { - *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off + 1; + *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off; } else { off = ptr_reg->smin_value + ptr_reg->off; - *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off; + *ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off - 1; } return 0; default: @@ -6089,7 +6089,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_ve off_reg = issrc ? insn->src_reg : insn->dst_reg; if (isneg) *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, off_reg, -1); - *patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit - 1); + *patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit); *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg); *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg); *patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0);