From: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com
commit 984a608377cb623351b8a3670b285f32ebeb2d32 upstream.
Commit 6edda04ccc7c ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") adds cond_resched() in the first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan(). However, it turns that the 2nd objection iteration loop can still cause soft lockup to happen in some cases. So add a cond_resched() call in the 2nd and 3rd loops as well to prevent that and for completeness.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221020175619.366317-1-longman@redhat.com Fixes: 6edda04ccc7c ("mm/kmemleak: prevent soft lockup in first object iteration loop of kmemleak_scan()") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com Cc: Catalin Marinas catalin.marinas@arm.com Cc: Muchun Song songmuchun@bytedance.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- mm/kmemleak.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c @@ -1464,6 +1464,27 @@ static void scan_gray_list(void) }
/* + * Conditionally call resched() in a object iteration loop while making sure + * that the given object won't go away without RCU read lock by performing a + * get_object() if !pinned. + * + * Return: false if can't do a cond_resched() due to get_object() failure + * true otherwise + */ +static bool kmemleak_cond_resched(struct kmemleak_object *object, bool pinned) +{ + if (!pinned && !get_object(object)) + return false; + + rcu_read_unlock(); + cond_resched(); + rcu_read_lock(); + if (!pinned) + put_object(object); + return true; +} + +/* * Scan data sections and all the referenced memory blocks allocated via the * kernel's standard allocators. This function must be called with the * scan_mutex held. @@ -1474,7 +1495,7 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) struct zone *zone; int __maybe_unused i; int new_leaks = 0; - int loop1_cnt = 0; + int loop_cnt = 0;
jiffies_last_scan = jiffies;
@@ -1483,7 +1504,6 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) { bool obj_pinned = false;
- loop1_cnt++; raw_spin_lock_irq(&object->lock); #ifdef DEBUG /* @@ -1517,24 +1537,11 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) raw_spin_unlock_irq(&object->lock);
/* - * Do a cond_resched() to avoid soft lockup every 64k objects. - * Make sure a reference has been taken so that the object - * won't go away without RCU read lock. + * Do a cond_resched() every 64k objects to avoid soft lockup. */ - if (!(loop1_cnt & 0xffff)) { - if (!obj_pinned && !get_object(object)) { - /* Try the next object instead */ - loop1_cnt--; - continue; - } - - rcu_read_unlock(); - cond_resched(); - rcu_read_lock(); - - if (!obj_pinned) - put_object(object); - } + if (!(++loop_cnt & 0xffff) && + !kmemleak_cond_resched(object, obj_pinned)) + loop_cnt--; /* Try again on next object */ } rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1601,8 +1608,16 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) * scan and color them gray until the next scan. */ rcu_read_lock(); + loop_cnt = 0; list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) { /* + * Do a cond_resched() every 64k objects to avoid soft lockup. + */ + if (!(++loop_cnt & 0xffff) && + !kmemleak_cond_resched(object, false)) + loop_cnt--; /* Try again on next object */ + + /* * This is racy but we can save the overhead of lock/unlock * calls. The missed objects, if any, should be caught in * the next scan. @@ -1635,8 +1650,16 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) * Scanning result reporting. */ rcu_read_lock(); + loop_cnt = 0; list_for_each_entry_rcu(object, &object_list, object_list) { /* + * Do a cond_resched() every 64k objects to avoid soft lockup. + */ + if (!(++loop_cnt & 0xffff) && + !kmemleak_cond_resched(object, false)) + loop_cnt--; /* Try again on next object */ + + /* * This is racy but we can save the overhead of lock/unlock * calls. The missed objects, if any, should be caught in * the next scan.