From: M. Vefa Bicakci m.v.b@runbox.com
commit 0991028cd49567d7016d1b224fe0117c35059f86 upstream.
Prior to this commit, if a grant mapping operation failed partially, some of the entries in the map_ops array would be invalid, whereas all of the entries in the kmap_ops array would be valid. This in turn would cause the following logic in gntdev_map_grant_pages to become invalid:
for (i = 0; i < map->count; i++) { if (map->map_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) { map->unmap_ops[i].handle = map->map_ops[i].handle; if (!use_ptemod) alloced++; } if (use_ptemod) { if (map->kmap_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) { if (map->map_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) alloced++; map->kunmap_ops[i].handle = map->kmap_ops[i].handle; } } } ... atomic_add(alloced, &map->live_grants);
Assume that use_ptemod is true (i.e., the domain mapping the granted pages is a paravirtualized domain). In the code excerpt above, note that the "alloced" variable is only incremented when both kmap_ops[i].status and map_ops[i].status are set to GNTST_okay (i.e., both mapping operations are successful). However, as also noted above, there are cases where a grant mapping operation fails partially, breaking the assumption of the code excerpt above.
The aforementioned causes map->live_grants to be incorrectly set. In some cases, all of the map_ops mappings fail, but all of the kmap_ops mappings succeed, meaning that live_grants may remain zero. This in turn makes it impossible to unmap the successfully grant-mapped pages pointed to by kmap_ops, because unmap_grant_pages has the following snippet of code at its beginning:
if (atomic_read(&map->live_grants) == 0) return; /* Nothing to do */
In other cases where only some of the map_ops mappings fail but all kmap_ops mappings succeed, live_grants is made positive, but when the user requests unmapping the grant-mapped pages, __unmap_grant_pages_done will then make map->live_grants negative, because the latter function does not check if all of the pages that were requested to be unmapped were actually unmapped, and the same function unconditionally subtracts "data->count" (i.e., a value that can be greater than map->live_grants) from map->live_grants. The side effects of a negative live_grants value have not been studied.
The net effect of all of this is that grant references are leaked in one of the above conditions. In Qubes OS v4.1 (which uses Xen's grant mechanism extensively for X11 GUI isolation), this issue manifests itself with warning messages like the following to be printed out by the Linux kernel in the VM that had granted pages (that contain X11 GUI window data) to dom0: "g.e. 0x1234 still pending", especially after the user rapidly resizes GUI VM windows (causing some grant-mapping operations to partially or completely fail, due to the fact that the VM unshares some of the pages as part of the window resizing, making the pages impossible to grant-map from dom0).
The fix for this issue involves counting all successful map_ops and kmap_ops mappings separately, and then adding the sum to live_grants. During unmapping, only the number of successfully unmapped grants is subtracted from live_grants. The code is also modified to check for negative live_grants values after the subtraction and warn the user.
Link: https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/7631 Fixes: dbe97cff7dd9 ("xen/gntdev: Avoid blocking in unmap_grant_pages()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: M. Vefa Bicakci m.v.b@runbox.com Acked-by: Demi Marie Obenour demi@invisiblethingslab.com Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221002222006.2077-2-m.v.b@runbox.com Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross jgross@suse.com Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour demi@invisiblethingslab.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c @@ -364,8 +364,7 @@ static int map_grant_pages(struct grant_ for (i = 0; i < map->count; i++) { if (map->map_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) { map->unmap_ops[i].handle = map->map_ops[i].handle; - if (!use_ptemod) - alloced++; + alloced++; } else if (!err) err = -EINVAL;
@@ -374,8 +373,7 @@ static int map_grant_pages(struct grant_
if (use_ptemod) { if (map->kmap_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) { - if (map->map_ops[i].status == GNTST_okay) - alloced++; + alloced++; map->kunmap_ops[i].handle = map->kmap_ops[i].handle; } else if (!err) err = -EINVAL; @@ -391,8 +389,14 @@ static void __unmap_grant_pages_done(int unsigned int i; struct grant_map *map = data->data; unsigned int offset = data->unmap_ops - map->unmap_ops; + int successful_unmaps = 0; + int live_grants;
for (i = 0; i < data->count; i++) { + if (map->unmap_ops[offset + i].status == GNTST_okay && + map->unmap_ops[offset + i].handle != -1) + successful_unmaps++; + WARN_ON(map->unmap_ops[offset+i].status && map->unmap_ops[offset+i].handle != -1); pr_debug("unmap handle=%d st=%d\n", @@ -400,6 +404,10 @@ static void __unmap_grant_pages_done(int map->unmap_ops[offset+i].status); map->unmap_ops[offset+i].handle = -1; if (use_ptemod) { + if (map->kunmap_ops[offset + i].status == GNTST_okay && + map->kunmap_ops[offset + i].handle != -1) + successful_unmaps++; + WARN_ON(map->kunmap_ops[offset+i].status && map->kunmap_ops[offset+i].handle != -1); pr_debug("kunmap handle=%u st=%d\n", @@ -408,11 +416,15 @@ static void __unmap_grant_pages_done(int map->kunmap_ops[offset+i].handle = -1; } } + /* * Decrease the live-grant counter. This must happen after the loop to * prevent premature reuse of the grants by gnttab_mmap(). */ - atomic_sub(data->count, &map->live_grants); + live_grants = atomic_sub_return(successful_unmaps, &map->live_grants); + if (WARN_ON(live_grants < 0)) + pr_err("%s: live_grants became negative (%d) after unmapping %d pages!\n", + __func__, live_grants, successful_unmaps);
/* Release reference taken by unmap_grant_pages */ gntdev_put_map(NULL, map);