Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v4.19.132, v4.14.188, v4.9.230, v4.4.230.
v5.7.8: Build OK! v5.4.51: Build OK! v4.19.132: Build OK! v4.14.188: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0013aceb30748 ("xtensa: clean up fixups in assembly code") 1af1e8a39dc0f ("xtensa: move fixmap and kmap just above the KSEG") 2a61f4747eeaa ("stack-protector: test compiler capability in Kconfig and drop AUTO mode") 2b8383927525d ("Makefile: move stack-protector compiler breakage test earlier") 2bc2f688fdf88 ("Makefile: move stack-protector availability out of Kconfig") 409d5db49867c ("arm64: rseq: Implement backend rseq calls and select HAVE_RSEQ") 40d1a07b333ef ("xtensa: enable stack protector") 44c6dc940b190 ("Makefile: introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO") 5cf97ebd8b40e ("xtensa: clean up functions in assembly code") 8d66772e869e7 ("arm64: Mask all exceptions during kernel_exit") 9800b9dc13cdf ("arm: Add restartable sequences support") a92d4d1454ab8 ("arm64: entry.S: move SError handling into a C function for future expansion") c2edb35ae342f ("xtensa: extract init_kio") c633544a61541 ("xtensa: add support for KASAN") d148eac0e70f0 ("Kbuild: rename HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR config variable") f37099b6992a0 ("arm64: convert syscall trace logic to C") f4431396be5b2 ("xtensa: consolidate kernel stack size related definitions")
v4.9.230: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2e ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 12964443e8d19 ("arm64: add on_accessible_stack()") 17c2895860092 ("arm64: Abstract syscallno manipulation") 34be98f4944f9 ("arm64: kernel: remove {THREAD,IRQ_STACK}_START_SP") 35d0e6fb4d219 ("arm64: syscallno is secretly an int, make it official") 8018ba4edfd3a ("arm64: move SEGMENT_ALIGN to <asm/memory.h>") 872d8327ce898 ("arm64: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection") 9842ceae9fa8d ("arm64: Add uprobe support") a92d4d1454ab8 ("arm64: entry.S: move SError handling into a C function for future expansion") a9ea0017ebe88 ("arm64: factor out current_stack_pointer") c02433dd6de32 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack") c7365330753c5 ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") cf7de27ab3517 ("arm64/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return") dbc9344a68e50 ("arm64: clean up THREAD_* definitions") f37099b6992a0 ("arm64: convert syscall trace logic to C") f60ad4edcf072 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions")
v4.4.230: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 0a28714c53fd4 ("arm64: Use PoU cache instr for I/D coherency") 0a8ea52c3eb15 ("arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature") 17c2895860092 ("arm64: Abstract syscallno manipulation") 2dd0e8d2d2a15 ("arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support") 35d0e6fb4d219 ("arm64: syscallno is secretly an int, make it official") 39a67d49ba353 ("arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support") 421dd6fa6709e ("arm64: factor work_pending state machine to C") 57f4959bad0a1 ("arm64: kernel: Add support for User Access Override") 872d8327ce898 ("arm64: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection") 9842ceae9fa8d ("arm64: Add uprobe support") a92d4d1454ab8 ("arm64: entry.S: move SError handling into a C function for future expansion") b11e5759bfac0 ("arm64: factor out entry stack manipulation") cf7de27ab3517 ("arm64/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return") d5370f7548754 ("arm64: prefetch: add alternative pattern for CPUs without a prefetcher") d59bee8872311 ("arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c") e04a28d45ff34 ("arm64: debug: re-enable irqs before sending breakpoint SIGTRAP") f37099b6992a0 ("arm64: convert syscall trace logic to C")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?