From: Peter Gonda pgonda@google.com
commit 47894e0fa6a56a42be6a47c767e79cce8125489d upstream.
The AMD Secure Processor (ASP) and an SNP guest use a series of AES-GCM keys called VMPCKs to communicate securely with each other. The IV to this scheme is a sequence number that both the ASP and the guest track.
Currently, this sequence number in a guest request must exactly match the sequence number tracked by the ASP. This means that if the guest sees an error from the host during a request it can only retry that exact request or disable the VMPCK to prevent an IV reuse. AES-GCM cannot tolerate IV reuse, see: "Authentication Failures in NIST version of GCM" - Antoine Joux et al.
In order to address this, make handle_guest_request() delete the VMPCK on any non successful return. To allow userspace querying the cert_data length make handle_guest_request() save the number of pages required by the host, then have handle_guest_request() retry the request without requesting the extended data, then return the number of pages required back to userspace.
[ bp: Massage, incorporate Tom's review comments. ]
Fixes: fce96cf044308 ("virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver") Reported-by: Peter Gonda pgonda@google.com Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda pgonda@google.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Reviewed-by: Tom Lendacky thomas.lendacky@amd.com Cc: stable@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221116175558.2373112-1-pgonda@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c index f422f9c58ba7..1ea6d2e5b218 100644 --- a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c +++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c @@ -67,8 +67,27 @@ static bool is_vmpck_empty(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev) return true; }
+/* + * If an error is received from the host or AMD Secure Processor (ASP) there + * are two options. Either retry the exact same encrypted request or discontinue + * using the VMPCK. + * + * This is because in the current encryption scheme GHCB v2 uses AES-GCM to + * encrypt the requests. The IV for this scheme is the sequence number. GCM + * cannot tolerate IV reuse. + * + * The ASP FW v1.51 only increments the sequence numbers on a successful + * guest<->ASP back and forth and only accepts messages at its exact sequence + * number. + * + * So if the sequence number were to be reused the encryption scheme is + * vulnerable. If the sequence number were incremented for a fresh IV the ASP + * will reject the request. + */ static void snp_disable_vmpck(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev) { + dev_alert(snp_dev->dev, "Disabling vmpck_id %d to prevent IV reuse.\n", + vmpck_id); memzero_explicit(snp_dev->vmpck, VMPCK_KEY_LEN); snp_dev->vmpck = NULL; } @@ -321,34 +340,71 @@ static int handle_guest_request(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, u64 exit_code, in if (rc) return rc;
- /* Call firmware to process the request */ + /* + * Call firmware to process the request. In this function the encrypted + * message enters shared memory with the host. So after this call the + * sequence number must be incremented or the VMPCK must be deleted to + * prevent reuse of the IV. + */ rc = snp_issue_guest_request(exit_code, &snp_dev->input, &err); + + /* + * If the extended guest request fails due to having too small of a + * certificate data buffer, retry the same guest request without the + * extended data request in order to increment the sequence number + * and thus avoid IV reuse. + */ + if (exit_code == SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST && + err == SNP_GUEST_REQ_INVALID_LEN) { + const unsigned int certs_npages = snp_dev->input.data_npages; + + exit_code = SVM_VMGEXIT_GUEST_REQUEST; + + /* + * If this call to the firmware succeeds, the sequence number can + * be incremented allowing for continued use of the VMPCK. If + * there is an error reflected in the return value, this value + * is checked further down and the result will be the deletion + * of the VMPCK and the error code being propagated back to the + * user as an ioctl() return code. + */ + rc = snp_issue_guest_request(exit_code, &snp_dev->input, &err); + + /* + * Override the error to inform callers the given extended + * request buffer size was too small and give the caller the + * required buffer size. + */ + err = SNP_GUEST_REQ_INVALID_LEN; + snp_dev->input.data_npages = certs_npages; + } + if (fw_err) *fw_err = err;
- if (rc) - return rc; + if (rc) { + dev_alert(snp_dev->dev, + "Detected error from ASP request. rc: %d, fw_err: %llu\n", + rc, *fw_err); + goto disable_vmpck; + }
- /* - * The verify_and_dec_payload() will fail only if the hypervisor is - * actively modifying the message header or corrupting the encrypted payload. - * This hints that hypervisor is acting in a bad faith. Disable the VMPCK so that - * the key cannot be used for any communication. The key is disabled to ensure - * that AES-GCM does not use the same IV while encrypting the request payload. - */ rc = verify_and_dec_payload(snp_dev, resp_buf, resp_sz); if (rc) { dev_alert(snp_dev->dev, - "Detected unexpected decode failure, disabling the vmpck_id %d\n", - vmpck_id); - snp_disable_vmpck(snp_dev); - return rc; + "Detected unexpected decode failure from ASP. rc: %d\n", + rc); + goto disable_vmpck; }
/* Increment to new message sequence after payload decryption was successful. */ snp_inc_msg_seqno(snp_dev);
return 0; + +disable_vmpck: + snp_disable_vmpck(snp_dev); + return rc; }
static int get_report(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_request_ioctl *arg)