On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 07:07:14PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 12/5/22 18:58, Miquel Raynal wrote:
marex@denx.de wrote on Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:26:53 +0100: , it's not complex to do, there are plenty of examples. This would be IMHO a better step ahead rather than just a cell change. Anyway, I don't mind reverting this once we've sorted this mess out and fixed U-Boot.
Won't we still have issues with older bootloader versions which paste partitions directly into this &gpmi {} node, and which needs to be fixed up in the parser in the end ?
Yes, I think so. While I do agree on printk warning and deprecated functions and use more modern and less problematic stuff, this should not come at the cost of failing the boot on board using some old U-Boot version.
Francesco