From: Chao Yu chao@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 935fc6fa6466cf18dd72dd1518ebc7bfc4cd58a4 ]
In __replace_atomic_write_block(), we missed to check return value of inc_valid_block_count(), for extreme testcase that f2fs image is run out of space, it may cause inconsistent status in between SIT table and total valid block count.
Cc: Daeho Jeong daehojeong@google.com Fixes: 3db1de0e582c ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu chao@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 1ca12ea8723b7..b2a080c660c86 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -246,10 +246,16 @@ static int __replace_atomic_write_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, } else { blkcnt_t count = 1;
+ err = inc_valid_block_count(sbi, inode, &count); + if (err) { + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn); + return err; + } + *old_addr = dn.data_blkaddr; f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1); dec_valid_block_count(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->cow_inode, count); - inc_valid_block_count(sbi, inode, &count); + f2fs_replace_block(sbi, &dn, dn.data_blkaddr, new_addr, ni.version, true, false); }