From: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 64dc8c732f5c2b406cc752e6aaa1bd5471159cab ]
Our test report a uaf for 'bfqq->bic' in 5.10:
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30
CPU: 6 PID: 2318352 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.10.0-60.18.0.50.h602.kasan.eulerosv2r11.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-20220320_160524-szxrtosci10000 04/01/2014 Call Trace: bfq_select_queue+0x378/0xa30 bfq_dispatch_request+0xe8/0x130 blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x62/0xb0 __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x215/0x2a0 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x8f/0xd0 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x98/0x180 __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x22b/0x240 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xe3/0x190 blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x107/0x200 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x26e/0x3c0 blk_finish_plug+0x63/0x90 __iomap_dio_rw+0x7b5/0x910 iomap_dio_rw+0x36/0x80 ext4_dio_read_iter+0x146/0x190 [ext4] ext4_file_read_iter+0x1e2/0x230 [ext4] new_sync_read+0x29f/0x400 vfs_read+0x24e/0x2d0 ksys_read+0xd5/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6
Commit 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") changes that move process to a new cgroup will allocate a new bfqq to use, however, the old bfqq and new bfqq can point to the same bic:
1) Initial state, two process with io in the same cgroup.
Process 1 Process 2 (BIC1) (BIC2) | Λ | Λ | | | | V | V | bfqq1 bfqq2
2) bfqq1 is merged to bfqq2.
Process 1 Process 2 (BIC1) (BIC2) | | -------------| V bfqq1 bfqq2(coop)
3) Process 1 exit, then issue new io(denoce IOA) from Process 2.
(BIC2) | Λ | | V | bfqq2(coop)
4) Before IOA is completed, move Process 2 to another cgroup and issue io.
Process 2 (BIC2) Λ |--------------\ | V bfqq2 bfqq3
Now that BIC2 points to bfqq3, while bfqq2 and bfqq3 both point to BIC2. If all the requests are completed, and Process 2 exit, BIC2 will be freed while there is no guarantee that bfqq2 will be freed before BIC2.
Fix the problem by clearing bfqq->bic while bfqq is detached from bic.
Fixes: 3bc5e683c67d ("bfq: Split shared queues on move between cgroups") Suggested-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Jan Kara jack@suse.cz Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221214030430.3304151-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 68872a61706a..528ca21044a5 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -386,6 +386,12 @@ static void bfq_put_stable_ref(struct bfq_queue *bfqq);
void bic_set_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, struct bfq_queue *bfqq, bool is_sync) { + struct bfq_queue *old_bfqq = bic->bfqq[is_sync]; + + /* Clear bic pointer if bfqq is detached from this bic */ + if (old_bfqq && old_bfqq->bic == bic) + old_bfqq->bic = NULL; + /* * If bfqq != NULL, then a non-stable queue merge between * bic->bfqq and bfqq is happening here. This causes troubles @@ -5379,7 +5385,6 @@ static void bfq_exit_icq_bfqq(struct bfq_io_cq *bic, bool is_sync) unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags); - bfqq->bic = NULL; bfq_exit_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq); bic_set_bfqq(bic, NULL, is_sync); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags);